Question Answering For Toxicological Information Extraction
No author records on this work.
Working with large amounts of text data has become hectic and time-consuming. In order to reduce human effort, costs, and make the process more efficient, companies and organizations resort to intelligent algorithms to automate and assist the manual work. This problem is also present in the field of toxicological analysis of chemical substances, where information needs to be searched from multiple documents. That said, we propose an approach that relies on Question Answering for acquiring information from unstructured data, in our case, English PDF documents containing information about physicochemical and toxicological properties of chemical substances. Experimental results confirm that our approach achieves promising results which can be applicable in the business scenario, especially if further revised by humans.
Citation edge evidence
- Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing→Question Answering For Toxicological Information ExtractionLegacy edge — source detail unavailable
- CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languages→Question Answering For Toxicological Information ExtractionLegacy edge — source detail unavailable
- ProtTrans: Toward Understanding the Language of Life Through Self-Supervised Learning→Question Answering For Toxicological Information ExtractionLegacy edge — source detail unavailable
- TinyBERT: Distilling BERT for Natural Language Understanding→Question Answering For Toxicological Information ExtractionLegacy edge — source detail unavailable
- Deep Learning--based Text Classification→Question Answering For Toxicological Information ExtractionLegacy edge — source detail unavailable
What cites it, inside the corpus
Links
Download BibTeX · Download RIS · DOI · Open access copy · OpenAlex record
Topics
| Topic Modeling | Computer Science |
| Natural Language Processing Techniques | Computer Science |
| Machine Learning and Data Classification | Computer Science |
Is this record sound?
suspect
Several fields of this record are missing or contradict each other. Treat its figures with suspicion — it is shown unaltered because correcting a source's record silently is worse than showing you the problem.
- weakensThe source lists no authors for this work at all, so there is nobody to attribute it to and it appears on no author page.
- weakensNo references are recorded despite 1,569 citations. A paper this heavily cited did not cite nothing, so the record is incomplete.
- supportsThe DOI's year agrees with the publication year.
- supportsA title is present.
Provenance
sha256 b3024609427ad450…